6-18 months (Aligned with the contractual duration of PCP Phase II and the Monitoring Team calendar defined in steps IV.A)
6-18 months (Aligned with the contractual duration of PCP Phase II and the Monitoring Team calendar defined in steps IV.A)
To assess the technical soundness, functionality, and usability of prototypes developed by contractors during Phase 2 according to the established verification protocol, verify alignment with the technical, functional, and operational requirements defined in the tender and recommendations/instructions from Phase 1, and ensure a fair, transparent, and traceable evaluation process that supports preparation for Phase 3 (pilot deployment).
Innovators / Providers (Internal)
Healthcare Professionals / Operational Staff
✅ Allow technical clarification meetings. Enable contractors to explain key elements without compromising fairness.
✅ Apply multi-expert review for each prototype, ensuring all assessments are justified and documented.
✅ Ensure clinical team participation in co-creation. Even if overloaded, their input is critical to ensure prototypes meet real operational needs.
✅ Evaluate compliance with all requirements and monitoring recommendations. Confirm technical, functional, and operational alignment throughout the phase.
✅ Prepare ethical documentation early. Start drafting submissions to ethics committees or medical device authorities early during prototype development.
✅ Detect unfeasibility early. Prioritise key requirements over optional features within contractual limits.
❌ Introduce new criteria mid-process. Always use the scoring framework defined in the tender.
❌Apply superficial or inconsistent verification. Avoid overlooking operational needs or technological diversity.
❌ Fail to follow a consistent verification protocol. Apply the agreed procedure uniformly to all contractors.
Browse our directory of experts who can provide professional guidance.